|Home||Energy Physics||Nuclear Power||Electricity||Climate Change||Lighting Control||Contacts||Links|
ADVANCED REACTOR TECHNOLOGY:
This web page outlines the logic behind sustainable advanced reactor technologies. It is shown that for dry land based electricity generation liquid sodium cooled Fast Neutron Reactors (FNRs) operated at 450 degrees C with Fe-Cr-Mo fuel tubes offer the advantages of both low material cost and low fuel reprocessing cost. Marine reactor applications for which liquid sodium is an unacceptable reactor coolant can in principle be met using thermal neutron reactors operated at 650 degrees C with an isotopically pure molten salt coolant. However, there remain unresolved material issues for reactors with molten salt coolants.
Modern advanced nuclear reactors used for public electricity generation must simultaneously meet multiple objectives including:
SUITABILITY FOR ELECTRICITY GENERATION:
1) No CO2 emission;
2) Dependable capacity;
3) Load following capability;
SUITABILITY FOR URBAN SITING:
4) Road truck portable equipment modules and fuel bundles;
5) Low pressure coolant for no exclusion zone outside NPP;
6) Certain avoidance of prompt neutron criticality;
7) Compact layout;
8) District heating compatibility;
9) Sustainable fuel cycle;
10) Capable of sustained reactor fleet growth;
11) Long lived nuclear waste disposal;
12) No neutron activation of enclosure or intermediate heat exchange bundles,
13) Autonomous operation;
14) Minimum maintenance cost;
15) Long equipment operating life;
16) Efficient electricity generation;
17) Modest capital cost.
There are many "paper reactor" concepts that for various reasons do not meet all of the aforementioned objectives. A summary of real advanced reactors is contained in the papers:
Generation IV Nuclear Reactors
Overview of Generation IV Reactor
IV Generation Nuclear Reactors
IMPACT OF COOLANT CHOICES:
Use of water as a primary coolant implies that load following not practical via reactor thermal power modulation. Has poor fuel utilization and results in large amounts of long lived nuclear waste. Relatively poor generation efficiency. Features simple materials and low capital cost per kWe.
Use of liquid sodium as a coolant implies reactor unsuitable for marine applications or flood plane or sea level siting, but enables fuel sustainability, minimal long lived nuclear waste and load following.
Use of molten salt as a coolant implies higher costs related to high temperature materials, ongoing maintenance and moderator disposal. However there is more siting flexibility than with sodium cooled reactors. Potentially able to operate using thorium fuel.
Use of hot gas coolant implies a physically large facility per kWt and ability to perform high temperture chemical reactions with little or no nuclear fuel recycling. Features simplicity for remote installation and operation.
FUEL SUSTAINABILITY AND NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL:
A major issue in the choice of an advanced nuclear reactor technology is long term fuel sustainability. The only fuel sustainable fission reactors are breeder reactors. There are two fuel breeding cycles. One fuel cycle uses fast neutrons to convert U-238 into Pu-239 and then fissions the Pu-239. The other fuel cycle uses either thermal or fast neutrons to convert Th-232 into U-233 and then fissions the U-233. However, the Th-232 based reactors rely on fissile start fuel supplied by the U-238 based fuel cycle for reactor fleet growth and rely on surplus neutrons from the U-238 based fuel cycle for nuclear waste disposal. The Th-232 fuel cycle also has complications related to the high thermal neutron absorption cross section of Pa-233 and related to formation of undesired U-232 which has a decay sequence with a hard gamma emission. Since at this time we urgently need to both grow the nuclear reactor fleet and dispose of nuclear waste this web page focuses on U-238 fuelled fast neutron breeder reactors.
The fuel for these reactors is initially: 20% Pu, 70% U, 10% Zr. This fuel can readily be realized via electrolytic nuclear fuel reprocessing and is highly resistant to nuclear weapon proliferation.
Breeder reactors must be physically large enough to minimize neutron leakage from their fuel blankets. Hence the concept of a road truck portable fully assembled fuel sustainable reactor is a pipe dream. Any real fuel sustainable reactor must be field assembled from multiple modules.
A paper which focuses on fissile fuel growth is: Reactor Physics Ideas to Design Novel Reactors with Faster Fissile Fuel Growth.
When there is a sufficiently large fleet of U-238 based breeder reactors to provide the fissile start fuel required by Th-232 fuel cycle reactors humans can pursue breeding of Th-232 into U-233.
A paper which focuses on minor actinide disposal is: A Liquid-Metal Reactor for Burning Minor Actinides of Spent Light Water Reactor Fuel.
FAST NEUTRON DAMAGE CONTROL:
As set out above, in order to achieve both fuel sustainability and nuclear waste disposal it is necessary to use fast neutron breeding of U-238 into Pu-239 to build a reactor fleet. However, fast neutrons are very destructive. Over time a fast neutron flux causes lattice dislocations, material swelling, embrittlement and chemical changes. The solution to this problem is to surround the reactor fuel assembly with a sufficient thickness of a stable liquid coolant to fully absorb leakage neutrons before the neutrons can reach reactor structural materials or the intermediate heat exchanger. Hence the fuel assembly should be contained in the center of a large liquid coolant pool and the heat exchangers should be located at the edge of the liquid coolant pool. Every six years one fifth of the entire fuel assembly should be replaced and its materials recycled.
POOL TYPE REACTORS:
A pool type liquid metal cooled or molten salt cooled reactor inherently operates at a low pressure and provides a substantial thermal mass which eliminates the pressure vessel risks inherent in reactors which contain high pressure super heated water. In a pool type reactor the coolant boiling point is far above the coolant's normal working temperature tosuppress void formation. The pool surface temperature is typically in the range 450 C to 650 C which is sufficient for efficient electricity generation.
Some paper reactor designs target operation at 800 degrees C to enable reforming of hydrocarbons.
The concept of dissolving nuclear fuel in primary coolant liquid salt generally proves unworkable in a pool type power FNR due to:
a) The coolant containment walls and heat exchanger being exposed to neutron damage;
b) Potentially dangerous prompt neutron criticality caused by fuel geometry instability in an earthquake;
c) Extreme tangential stresses on the containment pool walls during an earthquake if the fuel geometry is fixed;
d) Fission products corroding and/or depositing on heat exchange surfaces;
e) Evaporation of the radio active fission product Cs-137 from the coolant pool and condensing and coating everything in the reactor space, making heat exchanger replacement and other maintenance work in the reactor space somewhere between extremely difficult and impossible.
In order to achieve a long reactor working life and maintain a high reactor thermal output it is essential to prevent fission products migrating from the fuel to the primary coolant enclosure walls and depositing on the heat exchange surfaces. For safety in earthquake and like accident situations it is also essential to maintain a stable fuel geometry. Meeting this requirement requires that the fuel be contained in rigid sealed metal fuel tubes. The fuel tube alloy:
a) Must have a high melting point;
b) Must have a small neutron absorption cross section;
c) Must have a BCC crystal lattice over the fuel tube operating temperature range so as to resist material swelling due to fast neutron bombardment;
d) Should be primarily iron based for material economy.
Fuel tube materials currently contemplated or in use are alloys formed from Fe, Cr and Mo. Mo allows higher operating temperatures but introduces isotope separation challenges. The Fe-Cr ratio seems to be critical at about 12% Cr.
Over time the fuel tube material will be damaged by fast neutrons, so the fuel tubes must be replaced when the fuel is reprocessed. Ideally the fuel tube material should be recycled.
An important reactor safety issue is immediate fuel disassembly in a prompt neutron critical condition. This property is achieved by having an empty fuel tube plenum and by adding to the fuel tube contents a material that boils above the fuel operating temperature but below the fuel tube softening temperature. Then if the fuel suddenly rises in temperature due to prompt neutron criticality the fuel rapidly expands lengthwise to suppress the prompt critical condition. Typically within the fuel tube solid Pu-U-Zr fuel is surrounded by liquid sodium to achieve this behavior.
This metallic sodium serves three other important functions:
a) Chemically combining with fission product gases to form solids or liquids that reduce the operating gas pressure inside the fuel tube.
b) Chemically combining with corrosive fission products such as F, Cl, I, Br to prevent internal corrosion of the fuel tube.
c) Providing good thermal contact between the solid U-Pu-Zr fuel alloy and the fuel tube.
Note that it is impossible to maintain the required metallic Na inside a fuel tube containing oxide fuel due to ongoing oxide reduction. The aforementioned use of Na within the fuel tube only works for metallic fuel.
Note that the purpose of the Zr in the fuel is to inhibit formation of a low melting point Fe-Pu eutectic. If the fuel tube is formed from pure Mo this low temperature eutectic problem no longer exists. However, Mo has an isotope with a high neutron absorption cross section. Hence ideally Mo used for forming fuel tubes should be depleted in the problem isotope.
EFFECT OF FAST NEUTRONS:
Fast neutrons have typical energies of 2,000,000 eV. Crystal lattice binding energies are of the order of 1 eV. The mass of a metal lattice atom is typically 50X the mass of a neutron. Hence, in an elastic collision a fast neutron can easily transfer 2,000,000 eV / 50 = 40,000 eV to a metal lattice atom. This transferred energy is sufficient to severely disrupt the metal crystal lattice. When a material is exposed to a fast neutron flux the resulting lattice dislocations tend to make the material less dense. Typically a fast neutron flux will gradually convert a metal FCC (face centered cubic) crystal lattice into a less dense metal BCC (body centered cubic) crystal lattice, which phase change causes material swelling.
In order to minimize fast neutron induced fuel tube material swelling the fuel tube's fast neutron cross section should be minimized and the fuel tube material should initially already have a BCC crystal structure.
MAXIMUM OPERATING TEMPERATURE WITH Fe-Cr-Mo FUEL TUBES:
A steel alloy which is normally BCC at temperatures below 475 degrees C is Fe + 12% Cr + 1% Mo. This alloy is known HT-9. Absent a fast neutron flux above 475 degrees C the crystal structure of HT-9 spontaneously changes from BCC to FCC. However, when the material is exposed to a fast neutron flux it experiences lattice dislocations which seem to maintain the BCC structure above 500 degrees C. Below 650 degrees C the material does not significantly swell but in a fast neutron flux the material becomes very brittle. At 650 degrees C the material anneals releaving the brittleness, which suggests that the lattice dislocations disappear. However, that temperature is above the melting point of Pu and there are potential problems with Pu-Fe low temperature eutectic formation in spite of the presence of Zr. It appears that to achieve higher reactor operating temperatures pure Mo fuel tubes are required.
If it is desired to operate FNRs to 15% fuel burnup before fuel reprocessing it is essential to prevent fuel tube working life limiting fuel tube swelling. Hence it is necessary to live with some fuel tube enbrittlement.
If the reactor is operated at 650 degrees C in theory molten salt coolant can be used and the fuel tube enbrittlement is relieved. However, at that temperature there are potential problems with fuel tube failure due to Pu-Fe eutectic formation and U-Pu alloy phase instability.
Zr FUEL TUBES:
A possible alternative fuel tube material is zirconium. It has a HCP lattice and will start swelling immediately it is placed in a fast neutron flux but the swelling rate will be relatively low due to its relatively small neutron cross section. One advantage of Zr as a fuel tube material is that its higher permitted operating temperature potentially allows use of a molten salt as a primary coolant in place of liquid sodium.
Zirconium has a much smaller fast neutron absorption cross section than iron or chromium. However, at temperatures less tha 863 degrees C zirconium has a hexagonal close packed crystal structure. Hence, although it has about a 14X smaller neutron absorption cross section than Fe and Cr, Zr will start to slowly swell as soon as it is exposed to fast neutrons. Thus, unless a very high operating temperature is essential, Zr offers few tangible benefits over Fe-Cr-Mo and Zr is much more expensive.
Sigma Zr = 0.184 b
Sigma Fe = 2.56 b
Sigma Cr = 3.1 b
In order to transport heat by natural convection from the fuel tubes to the intermediate heat exchanger the primary coolant melting point should be at least 150 degrees C below the maximum coolant operating temperature. If the maximum coolant operating temperature is 462 degrees C this constraint eliminates molten salt coolants but is compatible with liquid sodium. Thus for compatibility with Fe-Cr fuel tubes operated at up to 462 degrees C the primary coolant should have a melting point less than 312 degrees C. The primary coolant boiling point must be far above 462 degrees C. Simply on the basis of melting and boiling points the possible elemental liquid primary coolant choices are bismuth (271.4 C), tin, lead, mercury, sulfur and sodium. Bismuth and tin, when neutron activated, form undesirable toxic long lived radio isotopes. Sulfur is too chemically corrosive. Mercury is dangerously toxic and has a relatively high vapor pressure in the contemplated operating temperature range. Sodium is chemically compatible with steel and has excellent nuclear properties. Lead is very dense, is less chemically compatible with steel and has inferior nuclear properties.
If the contemplated operating temperature is 650 degrees C in principle various low melting point salt mixtures might be used for the primary coolant. However, to minimize corrosion and nuclear waste accumulation the salts with low melting points rely on isotopically pure Li and Cl components, both of which are expensive. A further problem is that when Li-7 absorbs a neutron it decays to form He-4. In so doing it releases an agressive Cl or F atom from the salt that corrodes the containment wall. Salt mixtures without Li have higher melting points which trigger other forms of corrosion.
There is a proposed corrosion suppression mechanism based on the multi-valent property of uranium. However, this corrosion suppression mechanism has yet to be demonstrated in a practical molten salt cooled reactor. It is likely that this mechanism slows but does not prevent internal corrosion due to active Cl or F. Above 700 degrees C the Cr in the fuel tube alloy becomes mobile and is corroded by F which is released due to a change in U oxidation state from IV to III.
A conservative approach to this whole issue is to build a liquid sodium cooled reactor intended for 450 degree C operation. While this reactor is being designed and built the issue of the optimum fuel tube alloy and its preferred operating temperature will likely be better resolved. The danger of committing to a molten salt cooled reactor at this time is lack of certainty about the existence of sufficiently corrosion resistant materials for use in economic molten salt cooled reactors. Since development time is of the essence the more conservative path to pursue is liquid sodium cooling because we know it will work and will enable a long reactor operating life, whereas molten salt cooling has multiple technical uncertainties.
THE SIMPLICITY OF SODIUM:
For power reactors, from a material cost perspective, sodium as the primary coolant has the advantage that it is inherently inexpensive. The disadvantages of sodium are almost entirely related to its potential chemical interaction with air and water and its low heat capacity as compared to water.
When a very fast neutron hits a sodium atom nucleus a stable fluorine atom and a He-4 atom are produced. The fluorine atom immediately chemically combines with another sodium atom to produce a NaF sludge which sinks to the bottom of the primary sodium pool. The He-4 is a harmless off gas. When a thermal neutron is absorbed by a stable Na-23 atom after about 15 hours a stable Mg-24 atom is produced. The magnesium is more dense than liquid sodium and again forms a pool bottom sludge.
In the event of a fuel tube wall failure the use of sodium both inside and outside the fuel tube minimizes the flow of fission products from inside the fuel tube to outside the fuel tube.
These simple properties indicate that the primary coolant should be metallic sodium.
The choice of sodium as the primary coolant forces the thickness of the sodium guard band between the fuel assembly and other objects to be about 3 m. Then the heat exchangers and pool walls so protected have very long operating lives. Sodium has a relatively large thermal coefficient of expansion and a high thermal conductivity which contribute to natural primary coolant circulation and stable reactor primary coolant temperature control.
In order to achieve breeding the fuel assembly consists of a core zone surrounded by a blanket zone. To enable reactor power control by coolant thermal expansion the core zone is pancake shaped, being much wider and longer than it is thick. To compensate for the effect of fuel aging on the reactor temperature setpoint the fuel geometry is slowly changed by changing the vertical position of mobile fuel bundles with respect to their neighbouring fixed fuel bundles. This temperature setpoint modification method changes the thickness of the reactor core zone to compensate for slow changes in the fuel Pu concentration. This arrangement is made safe against gravity by inserting mobile fuel bundles into the matrix of fixed fuel bundles from the bottom rather than from the top.
To achieve high breeding efficiency the reactor core is surrounded by a thick U-238 blanket. Through the use of stacked U-238 fuel rods most of the blanket is divided into six concentric zones. After each fuel cycle the inner blanket fuel rods are reprocessed, the middle blanket fuel rods are moved to become the inner blanket rods, the outer blanket fuel rods are moved to become middle blanket fuel rods and the outer blanket is formed using new U-238 fuel rods. This methodology minimizes the required amount of blanket fuel reprocessing.
AUTOMATIC FUEL BUNDLE FABRICATION:
A practical power FNR contains as many as 1369 fuel bundles, each of which contains either 3920 or 5824 fuel rods. The fuel bundles are periodically replaced. To make FNRs economic the entire fuel reprocessing and fuel bundle fabrication procedure must be automated.
FNR STRUCTURE SUMMARY:
Thus the basic configuration of an economic FNR is a liquid sodium pool containing an assembly of vertical fuel tubes in the center of the pool and heat exchangers around the perimeter of the pool. The fuel tubes are in bundles. Metallic fuel rods are stacked in the fuel tubes along with liquid sodium so as to realize a pancake shaped reactor core zone and a surrounding blanket. The fuel tubes have empty plenums. The reactor temperature setpoint is adjusted by moving mobile fuel bundles up or down with respect to their adjacent fixed fuel bundles to change the reactor core zone thickness.
At this time the most satisfactory FNR fuel tube material is HT-9 (Fe-Cr-Mo). If liquid sodium coolant is used the reactor should be operated at about 450 degrees C. If the chemical properties of sodium are unacceptable a molten salt coolant can in theory be used for 650 degree C operation, but there will be corrosion problems. Suitable molten salt coolants are generally expensive due to required isotopic separations. A typical molten salt is 42% Li-7 Cl-37 - 58% K Cl-37 which has a melting point of 352 deg C. Note that expensive isotopic separations are required to obtain the Li-7 and Cl-37. Note that molten salts have high viscosities at temperatures within 100 degrees C of their melting point, so the practical operating temperature range of a molten salt cooled reactor with HT-9 fuel tubes is about 500 degree C to 650 degree C.
For dry land based bulk electricity generation due to material cost economy a liquid sodium cooled power reactor with Fe-Cr-Mo fuel tubes is the preferred technology. A liquid sodium cooled reactor must be sited at a sufficient elevation above its immediate surroundings that it will never be exposed to flood water. Safety requirements for reactors in marine applications might justify the additional costs of a molten salt cooled FNR.
A liquid sodium cooled FNR operated at 450 degrees C can be operated to 15% core fuel burnup.
The most cost effective way to use a nuclear reactor is for base load electricity generation. However, as fossil fuel generation is eliminated from electricity systems it is increasingly necessary for nuclear reactors to provide real time power control. The relevant issues are discussed in the document: Non-baseload Operation in Nuclear Power Plants: Load Following and Frequency Control Modes of Flexible Operation
The practical operating power range of a FNR is about from 8% of plate rating to 100% of plate rating. The minimum operating output power is set by fission product decay heat output. The operating output power is set by the secondary sodium flow rate and temperatures with respect to the primary sodium setpoint temperature. The maximum safe power is a function of fuel tube and other material parameters.
ADVANCED REACTOR CRITICISM:
There are major authors who do not believe in the importance of supporting sustainable existence of the human species. One of these authors is: Edwin Lyman who has written the text: Advanced Isn't Always Better. This text has been systematically criticized by Dr. Alex Cannara in his letter: Cannara Letter.
This web page last updated November 12, 2022
|Home||Energy Physics||Nuclear Power||Electricity||Climate Change||Lighting Control||Contacts||Links|